Systems Innovation LabPeople · Systems · Design
Our workCase 03 · Transport · 2020

Six and a half years of crash records, read as one system.

A road-trauma analysis our principal authored for a government transport authority. Included because it shows the method at population scale: every injury crash in an emirate over six and a half years, analysed against a model that says where prevention can act.

Final report, April 2020 Method and scale only. The client is not named and no finding from the report is reproduced, because the analysis and its results belong to them.
The frame

Four parts of one system.

The Safe System model holds that road trauma is produced by roads, speeds, vehicles and road users together, and that a system should be forgiving when one part fails. Every risk factor in the analysis was placed against the part of the system that could change it.

That is the same move as an AcciMap: a finding is only useful at the level with the authority to act on it.

The work

What the engagement was.

The data
Every injury crash, 2013 to 2019

At-scene crash reports for every crash in the emirate that produced at least one injury, from 1 January 2013 to 17 June 2019. Unusually detailed for road-crash data: each report records the road users, the vehicles, the road environment and the injuries together, which is what makes a systems reading possible at all.

Six and a half years · one emirate · all injury crashes
The method
Screening, rates, trends, association

The raw records were screened, cleaned and verified before anything was read from them. Crash, injury and fatality rates were put on a population and a vehicle-fleet basis so the emirate could be compared with itself over time, with its own regions, and with other countries. Trends were taken monthly and weekly across the whole period. Risk factors were tested for association with injury severity, and the size of each association was reported, not only whether it was significant.

SPSS · rate normalisation · association with effect size
The output
A 107-page final report, to be acted on

The report identified where the authority could target improvement, organised so that each risk factor sat with the part of the system able to change it, and written to feed policy and regulatory decisions rather than to sit in a file. Delivered as a final report in April 2020.

Final report · April 2020 · authored by our principal

The authority is not named here, and no finding from the report is reproduced. The analysis and its results belong to the client. What is described on this page is the method and the scale of the engagement.

The same method, at your scale.

A systems diagnostic reads your records the same way: exposure first, then trend, then the factors that change the outcome.

Tell us what is happening →